[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5213-1] schroot security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5213-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
August 18, 2022                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : schroot
CVE ID         : CVE-2022-2787

Julian Gilbey discovered that schroot, a tool allowing users to execute
commands in a chroot environment, had too permissive rules on chroot or
session names, allowing a denial of service on the schroot service for
all users that may start a schroot session.

Note that existing chroots and sessions are checked during upgrade, and
an upgrade is aborted if any future invalid name is detected.

Problematic session and chroots can be checked before upgrading with the
following command:

  schroot --list --all | LC_ALL=C grep -vE '^[a-z]+:[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_.-]*$'

See

  <https://codeberg.org/shelter/reschroot/src/tag/release/reschroot-1.6.13/NEWS#L10-L41>

for instructions on how to resolve such a situation.

For the stable distribution (bullseye), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.6.10-12+deb11u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your schroot packages.

For the detailed security status of schroot please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/schroot

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Gh4e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: