[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5024-1] apache-log4j2 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5024-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                          Markus Koschany
December 18, 2021                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : apache-log4j2
CVE ID         : CVE-2021-45105
Debian Bug     : 1001891

It was found that Apache Log4j2, a Logging Framework for Java, did not protect
from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. When the logging
configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with a Context Lookup (for
example, $${ctx:loginId}), attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC)
input data can craft malicious input data that contains a recursive lookup,
resulting in a denial of service.

For the oldstable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed
in version 2.17.0-1~deb10u1.

For the stable distribution (bullseye), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.17.0-1~deb11u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your apache-log4j2 packages.

For the detailed security status of apache-log4j2 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/apache-log4j2

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Wkr6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: