[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5015-1] samba security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5015-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
November 30, 2021                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : samba
CVE ID         : CVE-2020-25717

Andrew Bartlett discovered that Samba, a SMB/CIFS file, print, and login
server for Unix, may map domain users to local users in an undesired
way. This could allow a user in an AD domain to potentially become root
on domain members.

A new parameter "min domain uid" (default 1000) has been added to
specify the minimum uid allowed when mapping a local account to a domain
account.

Further details and workarounds can be found in the upstream advisory
https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html

For the oldstable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed
in version 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u2. Additionally the update mitigates
CVE-2020-25722. Unfortunately the changes required to fix additional
CVEs affecting Samba as an AD-compatible domain controller are too
invasive to be backported. Thus users using Samba as an AD-compatible
domain controller are encouraged to migrate to Debian bullseye. From
this point onwards AD domain controller setups are no longer supported
in Debian oldstable.

We recommend that you upgrade your samba packages.

For the detailed security status of samba please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/samba

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=emy4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: