[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4960-1] haproxy security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4960-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
August 17, 2021                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : haproxy
CVE ID         : not yet assigned

Several vulnerabilities were discovered in HAProxy, a fast and reliable
load balancing reverse proxy, which can result in HTTP request
smuggling. By carefully crafting HTTP/2 requests, it is possible to
smuggle another HTTP request to the backend selected by the HTTP/2
request. With certain configurations, it allows an attacker to send an
HTTP request to a backend, circumventing the backend selection logic.

Known workarounds are to disable HTTP/2 and set
"tune.h2.max-concurrent-streams" to 0 in the "global" section.

    global
        tune.h2.max-concurrent-streams 0

For the stable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been fixed in
version 2.2.9-2+deb11u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your haproxy packages.

For the detailed security status of haproxy please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/haproxy

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qE3E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: