[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4730-1] ruby-sanitize security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4730-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
July 19, 2020                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : ruby-sanitize
CVE ID         : CVE-2020-4054
Debian Bug     : 963808

Michal Bentkowski discovered that ruby-sanitize, a whitelist-based HTML
sanitizer, is prone to a HTML sanitization bypass vulnerability when
using the "relaxed" or a custom config allowing certain elements.
Content in a <math> or <svg> element may not be sanitized correctly even
if math and svg are not in the allowlist.

For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
version 4.6.6-2.1~deb10u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your ruby-sanitize packages.

For the detailed security status of ruby-sanitize please refer to its
security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ruby-sanitize

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=rbQg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: