[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4222-1] gnupg2 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4222-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
June 08, 2018                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : gnupg2
CVE ID         : CVE-2018-12020

Marcus Brinkmann discovered that GnuGPG performed insufficient
sanitisation of file names displayed in status messages, which could be
abused to fake the verification status of a signed email.

Details can be found in the upstream advisory at
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2018q2/000425.html

For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
in version 2.0.26-6+deb8u2.

For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.1.18-8~deb9u2.

We recommend that you upgrade your gnupg2 packages.

For the detailed security status of gnupg2 please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/gnupg2

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2Ci/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: